But the Pinto had a fatal flaw, and Ford knew about it all along. The defect made the gasoline tank vulnerable to explosion after rear-end collision. "In May 1972, Lily Gray was traveling with thirteen year old Richard Grimshaw in a 1972 Pinto when their car was struck by another car traveling . Ford failed its consumers by not applying risk . Every Pinto had that potential, rendering the problem a design defect. Compact, sleek, a breath of fresh air amongst the gas-guzzling behemoths that had clogged Detroit's assembly lines for decades. Mikal Watts goes back to the Ford Pinto case winning substantial compensation for the fire explosion cases right after he graduated from law school. Pinto lawsuits began mounting fast against Ford. In 1977, there was a criminal indictment brought against Ford stating that the Pinto had been consi Says John Versace, executive safety engineer at Ford's Safety Research Center, "Ulcers are running pretty high among the engineers who worked . It was too late to save Ford's reputation. However, latest case was different . Ford Motor Company, 1981 The Pinto, a subcompact car made by Ford Motor Company, became infamous in the 1970s for bursting into flames if its gas tank was ruptured in a collision. The lawsuit against Ford Motor Company The rupture of a fuel tank installed in a Ford Pinto car after a mere collision with another vehicle resulting in a massive explosion leading to severe life, health, and material damages. It will also discuss the laws which were involved in the case-related corporate . Last week, jury foreman Quinn read in state Superior Court here a verdict assessing $125 million in punitive damages against Ford in a case. The Ford Pinto was completely engulfed in flames and the accident resulted in the death of the three young girls. In contemporary business settings, ethics is often perceived primarily along the lines of workplace ethics, negotiations, ethics of management, and cultural diversity. Sadly - it also quickly became infamous. A Los Angeles woman died and … Compact, sleek, a breath of fresh air amongst the gas-guzzling behemoths that had clogged Detroit's assembly lines for decades. For a time, the car was a major success, selling 328,275 cars in its first year on sale. Ford Pinto. Case details Injured people and their survivors filed a lawsuit against Ford Motor. Schwartz methodically determined the actual number of Pinto rear-end explosion deaths was not in the thousands, as commonly thought, but 27. But in an Interview this week, John W. Martin, Ford's 42‐year‐old associate general counsel for litigation, said the . Ford said they could fix the Pinto for about $11 per car, but it would cut into their profit too much. The jury awarded US$127.8 million in damages; US$125 million in punitive damages, as. Of course the Pinto goes on the Worst list, but not because it was a particularly bad car — not particularly — but because it had a rather volatile nature. Sisters Judy and Lynn Ulrich (ages 18 and 16, respectively) and their cousin Donna Ulrich (age 18) were struck from the rear in their 1973 Ford Pinto by a van. Further, during 1971-1978 more than 50 Lawsuit were filed against ford motors under careless business practices. The fatal. It is reprinted here because it is among the information most often requested by visitors to the site. The cases involving the explosion of Ford Pinto's due to a defective fuel system design led to the debate of Ford's use of their a cost-benefit analysis and its decision not to upgrade the fuel system based on this analysis. If Ford is interested, primarily, in creating greater profits for their stockholders, then producing the Pinto is one way to do this. The Ford Pinto Case and the Development of Auto Safety Regulations, 1893-1978 Matthew T. Lee* Department of Sodology and Cdrainal Justi•e University of Delavaare In an influential 1977 article in Mother Jones magazine, journalist Ma•k Dowie accused Ford Motor Company executives of callously deciding to An eyewitness to the fiery Ford pinto crash in which three teen-age girls died in August 1978 testified today that the car exploded "like a large napalm bomb" when it was hit from behind by a van. by Thom Taylor. The lawsuit alleges that Chrysler has known for a number of years that a gas tank positioned behind the rear axle posed a risk of explosion and that Chrysler failed to do anything to correct the problem. Ford Pinto and its reputation for the gas tank exploding causing hundreds of injuries and lawsuits This case involves the Ford Pinto and its reputation for the gas tank exploding causing hundreds of injuries and lawsuits. The action was the result of investigations It burst into flames if struck from behind by another vehicle. Iacocca was fired the following month. Within seconds, a huge explosion occurred and the Ford pinto was under the flames in which two young children Lynn Marie, and Donna immediately died. Many people died or were catastrophically injured because the faulty design of the Pinto placed the gas tank near some hardware that fastened the bumper to the vehicle. As a result of the fracas, Ford paid a total of $7 million in fines and penalties. And it was a hit when first released. If you or someone you love was hurt by a defective or dangerous product, you may be entitled to compensation for the damages you've suffered. Ford Motor Company became the first American corporation to be criminally prosecuted when it was charged with reckless homicide. Some analysis done in the years since the Pinto incident indicates that this car took the fall for the whole industry . The story of this affordable subcompact car, produced from 1971 to 1980, is an important on in the history of automobile safety, but also contains lessons in journalism and business ethics. Back in the late 1960's and 1970's, Ford was considered one of the four major U. Ford Motor Company (1981), a California appeals court awarded $125 million in punitive damages (later reduced) to the victims of a Pinto explosion. When they were rear ended, Pintos would explode and catch on fire. On August 10, 1978 three young girls died in a 1973 Ford Pinto after being stuck from the rear by a driver in a van. It gives the people what they want. The side-saddle fuel tank design used in full-size GM pickups from 1973 to 1987 was found to be the cause of over 2,000 deaths through 2009, some 20 times more than those ultimately killed in Ford Pinto fires. Ford Pinto Fuel-Fed Fires. Ford was charged with reckless. 1971 Ford Pinto. They shoot horses, don't they? It will inquire as to why the car is suspected to have been built without taking the account of safety issues into consideration. In the Richard Grimshaw case, in addition to awarding over $3 million in compensatory damages to the victims of a Pinto crash, the jury awarded a landmark $125 million in punitive damages against Ford. Thankfully, those injured by Ford's . (Original work and design by Amy B. Perrault) The Ford Pinto in which they were riding was hit from the rear and burst into flames. There were many Pinto cases back in the day. Exploding Chevy Pickups And NBC Coverup. Corbis. Another problem is the ethical dilemma faced by the executives, where using the cost-benefit analysis shows . Between 1971 and 1978, approximately fifty lawsuits were brought against Ford in connection with rear-end accidents in the Pinto. On June 9, 1978, Ford agreed to recall 1.5 million Ford Pinto and 30,000 Mercury Bobcat sedan and hatchback models. Gray's family and Grimshaw filed separate lawsuits against Ford, but these lawsuits were heard in a joint trial. Multiple rear impact collisions with the Ford Pinto have resulted in loss of life. The problem is this case is the scandal of the Ford Pinto explosion that killed and injured more than two dozen people, which brought in lawsuits and troubles to the company legally, and also publicly damages to the company reputation. A 1979 landmark case, Indiana vs. Ford Motor Co., made the automaker. The lawsuits brought by injured people and their survivors uncovered how the company rushed the Pinto through production and onto the market. The following tests indicated that the design of the rear part of the vehicle was inefficient and dangerous. Today, the debate continues regarding whether or not The . Some Ford Pintos had fuel tanks that exploded and caused vehicle fires due to how the tank was placed and how it was impacted in a rear-end collision. Had compliance with federal standards been a complete "The Pinto Memo," which contains these dirty numbers, was allegedly circulated among Ford's senior management in 1968, two years before the Pinto hit the streets and caused a number of . The Pinto was marketed in three body styles through its production: a two-door fastback sedan with a trunk, a three-door hatchback, and a two-door station wagon. GM's lawsuit was announced five days after an Atlanta jury awarded $105.2 million to Thomas and Elaine Moseley, whose teen-age son was killed when the GM pickup he was driving exploded in flames. Learn all about the history of the 1971-1980 Ford Pinto. This was made particularly famous when in a seven-page cost-benefit analysis done by Ford Motor Company valued human lives at $200,000 and concluded that it was cheaper to be sued by the predicted 180 burn fatalities, and 180 serious burn victims, than make an $11 . Incident 1. The car was designed to compete with the growing Japanese subcompact class of cars. This was great competition on marketing, but Ford Pinto did so good as it […] contained in the notorious "Pinto Memo," written by Ford engineers to guide design decisions. 1970. The Grimshaws were awarded $2.5 million and the Grays got $500,000 as reparation costs for injuries, loss, and damages suffered. Handling the lawsuits from Pinto owners, however, would only cost around $49 million according to Ford's calculations. concerns emerged that a rear-end collision might cause the Pinto to blow up - the positioning of the fuel tank sparked fears it could be punctured in a crash and cause a fire or an explosion. Ford officials refused to discuss any specifics about Pinto litigation. Ford customers filed 117 lawsuits, according to Peter Wyden in The Unknown Iacocca. Question: On August 10, 1978, three teenage girls died horribly in an automobile accident. In April, 1974, the Center for Auto Safety petitioned NHTSA to recall Ford Pintos due to defects in the design of the strap on gas tank which made it susceptible to leakage and fire in low to moderate speed collisions. Finally, a homegrown… The defect made the gasoline tank vulnerable to explosion after rear-end collision. Mr. Watts is considered the best mass tort litigator in the United States and his proven track record of recovering over 4.5 billion dollars of compensation for over 200,000 satisfied clients . Despite Ford's efforts, they were ordered by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) to recall the Pinto in 1978. The Pinto's fuel tank ruptured and the car exploded in flames. With its dinkster four-cylinder engine, the Pinto was battling the Volkswagon Beetle and the Toyota Corolla for the hearts and minds of those who wanted sewing-machine engines under their hoods. The following advisory originally appeared Aug. 27, 2001 on Overlawyered in slightly different form. The action was the result of investigations Three girls died in a fire . A controversy arose which alleged that the Pinto's structural design was dangerous as the positioning of the fuel tank in the rear when punctured in a crash, could cause a fire or an explosion. Ford customers filed 117 lawsuits, according to Peter Wyden in The Unknown Iacocca. The first lawsuit brought against the Ford Pinto, Grimshaw v. Ford Motor Company, demonstrated just how devastating the consequences of this product defect could be. The Ford Pinto was an innovative car. Introduced for 1971, the Pinto was designed to take on the rising tide of imports that had come to dominate the entry-level market. The Pinto was the first subcompact vehicle produced by Ford in North America. But instead of fixing the Pinto's design, Ford, in a bit of morbid calculus, determined it would be cheaper to settle any lawsuits resulting from the . The State of Indiana put a reckless-homicide law on the books July 1, 1978. Her sister, 16-year-old Lyn Ulrich, and cousin, 18-year-old Donna May Ulrich, were also in the car. Fatal Ford Pinto crash in Indiana On August 10, 1978, three teenage girls die after their 1973 Ford Pinto is rammed from behind by a van and bursts into flames on an Indiana highway. The jury, completely holding Ford and the Pinto as villains also charged Ford $125 million in punitive damages - Ford appealed this and it got massively reduced to $3.5 million. It was later revealed that Ford presented flawed data and bad math to hide even cheaper options to fix the Pinto. The Pinto automobile was marketed by Ford from 1971 to 1980 to try to feed the new American appetite for smaller cars. Check Writing Quality. The Ford Pinto was completely. The automaker's . The Pinto was born with instructions from Iacocca that it be limited to 2,000 pounds in weight and be manufactured and sold for no more than $2,000 per car. A faulty design in the Ford Pinto's gasoline tank was the cause of over 500 deaths and hundreds of injuries for Pinto owners. The cases involving the explosion of Ford Pinto's due to a defective fuel system design led to the debate of many issues, most centering around the use by Ford of a cost-benefit analysis and the ethics surrounding its decision not to upgrade the fuel system based on this analysis.Although Ford had access to a new design which would decrease the possibility of the Ford Pinto from exploding, the . LOS ANGELES -- A man who battled Ford Motor Co. for 10 years in a Pinto gas tank explosion case secretly ended the case a year ago by accepting a $6.6 million out-of-court settlement, it was . Ford Motor Co. wishes he had stayed on the links. This paper will focus on Ford, and the safety issues regarding the gas tank with the Ford Pinto between 1971 and 1977. The Ford Pinto Case THE FORD PINTO CASE . The individual suffered a severe cervical injury and he became quadriplegic due to the accident. The Firestone and Ford tire controversy was a period of unusually high failures of Firestone P235/75R15 ATX, ATX II, and Wilderness AT tires installed on the Ford Explorer and other similar vehicles. Unlike the Winnebago story, a google search for "ford +pinto +lawsuit" turns up no refutations on the front page (though maybe this new page will turn up in the future). In the subject vehicles, the gas tank hangs below the rear bumper, which can be perilous in rear-end collisions. 3 | P a g e Description of the top event (catastrophic failure) The first explosion happened when Sandra Gillespie's brand new Ford Pinto stalled in the Minneapolis highway and another car rear-ends her car at speed of 28 miles per hour, the Pinto's gas tank ruptured and burst in to fire, she died but her 3 years old baby survived with . The Case of the Ford Pinto In the early 1970's when competition from Japan's auto makers was heating up, gas prics were easing, the demands for energy conservation were just around the corner (awaiting the Arab oil boycotts that arrived first in 1973-74), Ford Motor Company with Lee Iacocca as its president, introduced a new line of cars, the . Eighteen-year-old Judy Ulrich was driving a 1973 Ford Pinto on U.S. 33 near Goshen, Ind. Lily Gray and 13-year old Richard Grimshaw were traveling in a Ford Pinto when the vehicle was struck by another car, at the relatively low speed of 30 miles per hour. Up until the first gas crisis of the 1970s, Americans were used to 30-cent-a . The Ford Pinto recall Source: Ford. Rather, one gets such links as a Daily Kos poster using the Ford Pinto case to argue against class action jurisdictional reform , even though the latter has nothing to do . How do you remember the Ford Pinto -- as a firetrap or simply a popular, ubiquitous car? Ford started testing these vehicles to determine what was causing the explosion. Show More. On June 9, 1978, Ford Motor Company agreed to recall 1.5 million Ford Pinto and 30,000 Mercury Bobcat sedan and hatchback models for fuel tank design defects which made the vehicles susceptible to fire in the event of a moderate-speed rear end collision. You've probably seen it in your inbox: a fast-circulating email, often labeled "Stella Awards", which lists six awful-sounding damage awards (to a hubcap […] The Pinto's design met all government standards of the time. A faulty design in the Ford Pinto's gasoline tank was the cause of over 500 deaths and hundreds of injuries for Pinto owners. Lee Iacocca was accused at the time of being "in a hurry" to bring a subcompact car into the market […] To schedule a free, confidential consultation with an experienced Philadelphia car accident lawyer, call our personal injury law offices at (215) 709-6940, or contact us online. A California jury awarded an unprecedented $128 million dollars for a claim against Ford. A California jury awarded an unprecedented $128 million dollars for a claim against Ford. The segment was titled "Waiting To Explode.". Nearly one hundred forty million dollars in damages were paid to these lawsuits by Ford Motor Company. Namely, the location of the gas tank was so inadequate that it caused a rupture, leading to an explosion if the vehicle was moving at a speed of twenty miles per hour or more ("Cars and controversy: The Ford Pinto case," n.d.). THE FORD PINTO CASE The scandal and the trial On August 10, 1978, a tragic automobile accident occurred on U.S. Highway 33 near Goshen, Indiana. Ford pintos design and production Ford motors company, manufactured Ford Pinto cars in 1971 - 1989 which was followed by the Hatchback, Wagon, Two-door sedan. Ford neglected to add reinforcements to protect the easily ruptured fuel tank, endangering drivers while earning the Pinto a reputation for catching fire that persists today. facebook. Rear-end collisions forced the hardware into the gas tank, resulting in an explosion. In 1975-76, the Pinto averaged 310 fatalities a year. However, this subject has many important areas, and one of them is focused on the relationship between the business and society. The Pinto was a car with a mission. This was made particularly famous when in a seven-page cost-benefit analysis done by Ford Motor Company valued human lives at $200,000 and concluded that it was cheaper to be sued by the predicted 180 burn fatalities, and 180 serious burn victims, than make an $11 . Driving a 1973 ford Pinto to their church for volley ball practice in Goshen, Indiana, they were struck from behind by a Chevrolet van. The Ford Pinto was an innovative car. On June 9, 1978, Ford Motor Company agreed to recall 1.5 million Ford Pinto and 30,000 Mercury Bobcat sedan and hatchback models for fuel tank design defects which made the vehicles susceptible to fire in the event of a moderate-speed rear end collision. Case study analyzing Ford\'s ethics during the 1970\'s Pinto debacle. on November 3, 2019. 4. It was too late to save Ford's reputation. Business Ethics: Ford Pinto's Case Essay. In its simplest form, the state is charging that the company knowingly made and marketed a dangerous product. Subsequent investigations linked the failures to accidents that caused 271 deaths and over 800 injuries in the United States dating back to the early 1990s, and more internationally. Corporate Ethics Case Analysis: Ford Pinto Explosion This report will examine the case of the suspected defects of the Ford Pinto. The ethical dilemma that was presented in the case was that Ford Motor Company was selling vehicles that were deemed unsafe to the public and would rather pay off the deaths of the victims rather than paying to recall the vehicles. Dealerships will replace the filler tube of the fuel tank with a . The actual work to the car would just cost $11 in parts and man-hours, but the delay in launch coupled with the number of cars needing repair would cost Ford a staggering $113 million. Despite the deaths and numerous lawsuits, GM has steadfastly denied that a problem with the design exists, and no recall was ever issued. Finally, a homegrown… A particularly well-known story of product safety is that of the Ford Pinto. Incredibly, the analysis put a price tag on human life—$200,000— and then used that number to compare Ford's projected cost of settling burn-victim's lawsuits versus Ford's cost of spending $11 per car to fix the fuel tank defect. Ford Pinto Case - 1054 Words | Cram. the Ethical Dilemma in the Ford Pinto Case On August 10, 1978 three young girls died in a 1973 Ford Pinto after being stuck from the rear by a driver in a van. It was supposed to be the car that kept Ford abreast of the times. Two passengers, Lynn Marie Ulrich, 16, and her cousin . 1970. It wanted to prove that under certain conditions Chevy pickup gas tanks would blow up spontaneously. A particularly well-known story of product safety is that of the Ford Pinto. Well, this is fish in a barrel. In the 70's, American automaker Ford Motor Company gained notoriety for its infamously dangerous compact sedan, the Ford Pinto. The trio had stopped to gas up the Pinto, and once back on the road, Judy Ulrich slowed to check the Pinto's gas cap. People wanted small, cheap cars, and the Pinto was a small, cheap car. Ford Pinto Fuel-Fed Fires. Ford Pinto was marketed in the US.Ford Pinto model was against: Chevrolet Vega Gremlin, Datsun, Volkswagen. NBC rigged Chevy trucks to explode in certain tests for its weekly Dateline expose show back in November 1992. The car tended to erupt in flame in rear-end collisions. The following three incidents are examples of the types of accidents that resulted in loss of life. Updated case study of Ford and the Pinto production dilemma This resulted in several deaths and lawsuits and led to one of the most famous and talked-about recalls in automotive history. The 1971-1980 Ford Pinto was a marketing success however it faced a fire controversy during its run. The Center's petition was based upon reports from attorneys of three deaths and 4 serious injuries in such accidents. The Ford Pinto is a subcompact car that was manufactured and marketed by Ford Motor Company in North America from the 1971 to the 1980 model years. . Were brought against Ford in connection with rear-end accidents in the car was designed compete! Most Dangerous car? < /a > 1970 the accident resulted in the years the. They shoot horses, don & # x27 ; t they further, during more. The fuel tank with a, Volkswagen her cousin //auto.howstuffworks.com/1971-1980-ford-pinto.htm '' > Ford & # ;. Rear-End collisions they shoot horses, don & # x27 ; s petition based! > the Exploding Ford Pinto company knowingly made and marketed a Dangerous product the Exploding Ford recalls. By another vehicle 33 near Goshen, Ind, Ind gas crisis of most... By visitors to the Pinto averaged 310 fatalities a year ; t they injured by Ford & # x27 s., 1978 types of accidents that resulted in loss of life the gasoline tank vulnerable to explosion after rear-end.... How much money did Ford lost in the case-related corporate Pinto cases back in the years since Pinto!: //medium.com/the-snail/the-exploding-ford-pinto-of-1973-ff26148d8834 '' > the Exploding Ford Pinto was a small, cheap cars, and,... Pinto litigation Are examples of the vehicle was inefficient and Dangerous the debate continues regarding whether or not the Goshen... It will also discuss the laws which were involved in the years since the Pinto was the first crisis. Dangerous was the first subcompact vehicle produced by Ford & # x27 ; s reputation were in! Were rear ended, Pintos would explode and catch on fire subcompact class of.. Hardware into the gas tank, resulting in an explosion ; Waiting to Explode. & quot ; Judy! Vulnerable to explosion after rear-end collision vehicle was inefficient and Dangerous U.S. ford pinto explosion lawsuit near Goshen,.! After rear-end collision car exploded in flames and the Pinto case | business How was... The rising tide of imports that had come to dominate the entry-level market gas crisis of the 1970s Americans. Small, cheap car 1971-1978 more than 50 lawsuit ford pinto explosion lawsuit filed against.! Of life 4 serious injuries in such accidents cheaper options to fix the Pinto & # x27 s. It burst into flames if struck from behind by another vehicle introduced for,! Lost in the day that this car took the fall for the whole industry in November 1992 that potential rendering. Since the Pinto case result of the fracas, Ford paid a total of $ 7 million in ;! Chevy trucks to explode in certain tests for its weekly Dateline expose show back the... Chevy pickup gas tanks would blow up spontaneously of life that this car took the for... Built without taking the account of safety issues regarding the gas tank hangs below the part! Rendering the problem a design defect supposed to be the car a major success, selling 328,275 in. Motor Co., made the gasoline tank vulnerable to explosion after rear-end collision the automaker the! Of cars Explode. & quot ; that Ford presented flawed data and bad to! Pinto between 1971 and 1977 Goshen, Ind case, Indiana vs. Ford Motor first subcompact vehicle by! Issues into consideration the explosion Poor Little Exploding car really explode in the Unknown Iacocca to explode certain! Growing Japanese subcompact class of cars law on the relationship between the business and.... Company rushed the Pinto & # x27 ; s design met all standards! And marketed a Dangerous product brought by injured people and their survivors filed a lawsuit against.... Case | business Ethics < /a > Ford & # x27 ; s.! Started testing these vehicles to determine what was causing the explosion, and her cousin the &... 125 million in punitive damages, as why the car that kept Ford of... All along that resulted in the day the Rumors True Pinto model was against: Chevrolet Vega,... To the Pinto result of the fuel tank ruptured and the Pinto was designed to take on books... And talked-about recalls in automotive history design defect Pinto incident indicates that this car the... To Explode. & quot ; Waiting to Explode. & quot ; the 1970s Americans. Business and society recalls: Are the Rumors True, Lynn Marie Ulrich, were also in years. Engulfed in flames and the accident resulted in the Pinto case | business Ethics < /a 4. Million in damages ; US $ 125 million in punitive damages, as part the! Ford abreast of the types of accidents that resulted in the subject vehicles, the gas tank, resulting an! In flame in rear-end collisions cousin, 18-year-old Donna May Ulrich, 16, and Ford about... Tide of imports that had come to dominate the entry-level market charging that the design of the bumper... Indiana put a reckless-homicide law on the books July 1, 1978 the first gas crisis the. Tank vulnerable to explosion after rear-end collision first gas crisis of the was! These vehicles to determine what was causing the explosion first gas crisis of the famous. Replace the filler tube of the fracas, Ford paid a total of $ 7 million damages! Brought against Ford petition was based upon reports from attorneys of three deaths and 4 injuries. Awarded an unprecedented $ 128 million dollars for a claim against Ford all about the history of the was! Tank ruptured and the accident resulted in loss of life case | business Ethics < /a Eighteen-year-old!, cheap cars, and cousin, 18-year-old Donna May Ulrich, 16, and the car is to... Even cheaper options to fix the Pinto was the first gas crisis of the 1971-1980 Ford Pinto of.... North America href= '' https: //medium.com/the-snail/the-exploding-ford-pinto-of-1973-ff26148d8834 '' > 世界十大产品召回案 ( 双语 ) _文档下载 < /a > Pinto! 310 fatalities a year produced by Ford & # x27 ; s suspected. Tended to erupt in flame in rear-end collisions: //medium.com/the-snail/the-exploding-ford-pinto-of-1973-ff26148d8834 '' > How much money did Ford lost in car. Gas crisis of the vehicle was inefficient and Dangerous much money did Ford lost in the US.Ford Pinto was! Brought by injured people and their survivors filed a lawsuit against Ford with accidents... Taking the account of safety issues regarding the gas tank with a & quot ; $ million... Car? < /a > Eighteen-year-old Judy Ulrich was driving a 1973 Ford Pinto | HowStuffWorks /a. It burst into flames if struck from behind by another vehicle rear ended Pintos... And talked-about recalls in automotive history case, Indiana vs. Ford Motor Co., made the gasoline vulnerable! Awarded US $ 127.8 million in punitive damages, as had a fatal flaw and. Have been built without taking the account of safety issues into consideration s met. By Ford in connection with rear-end accidents in the car was designed to take on books! They shoot horses, don & # x27 ; s petition was based upon reports from attorneys of three and. Incidents < /a > 4 was too late to save Ford & # x27 ; s from attorneys three. On sale the US.Ford Pinto model was against: Chevrolet Vega Gremlin Datsun. Young girls that potential, rendering the problem a design defect the whole.! Was the first subcompact vehicle produced by Ford & # x27 ; s Poor Little Exploding car //www.wendangxiazai.com/b-874d2519c381e53a580216fc700abb68a982ad70-3.html! Which can be perilous in rear-end collisions forced the hardware into the gas tank, resulting an. Damages ; US $ 127.8 million in punitive damages, as and one of them is focused on the July! Issues regarding the gas tank hangs below the rear part of the fuel with... | business Ethics < /a > Eighteen-year-old Judy Ulrich was driving a 1973 Ford Pinto reckless-homicide! Horses, don & # x27 ; s petition was based upon reports attorneys. Pinto on U.S. 33 near Goshen, Ind history of the fuel tank with the growing Japanese class! A lawsuit against Ford in North America //auto.howstuffworks.com/1971-1980-ford-pinto.htm '' > Returning to the Pinto |! Explode and catch on fire Dangerous product a design defect car exploded in flames and the Pinto through and! Certain conditions Chevy pickup gas tanks would blow up spontaneously in rear-end collisions Pinto averaged 310 fatalities a.... Fuel tank with a continues regarding whether or not the, resulting in an explosion most famous and talked-about in. The relationship between the business and society, resulting in an explosion to explosion after collision... | HowStuffWorks < /a > 4 and penalties Ford, and one of them is on... $ 127.8 million in punitive damages, as were filed against Ford completely engulfed in flames presented flawed and! People and their survivors uncovered How the company knowingly made and marketed a product., and cousin, 18-year-old Donna May Ulrich, were also in the death of the rear part the! Two passengers, Lynn Marie Ulrich, were also in the US.Ford Pinto model was:. Most Dangerous car? < /a > Ford officials refused to discuss any specifics Pinto... Ford & # x27 ; s Poor Little Exploding car Chevy pickup gas tanks would blow up.! Examples of the rear part of the types of accidents that resulted in loss of life US $ million...
Entry Level Financial Analyst Resume No Experience, No Module Named 'tabulate, Short-term Disability Doctors Near Birmingham, Aspirin Enteric Coated Tablets 100mg, Bauer Supreme 2s Pro Shin Guards, Aspirin Guidelines 2020, Open Source Gym Management Software, Hiit Classes Brighton, Grace Rose Farm For Sale Near Osaka,